sorry : 

"think it should have any kind of problems for that" 

I meant it shouldn't have....

Cheers! 

El 2022-07-06 12:43, [email protected] escribió:

> Hi! 
> 
> I suppose too it can't affect but... we are not starting master as root. We 
> run it as user and we use ports like 1430 or 1100 for listening and avoid the 
> need of using user root. I can't see nothing bad or wrong there... but... 
> just telling because master is awaited to be started as root but.... I think 
> it should have any kind of problems for that because the user has no 
> meaningful limits... not file descriptor limits, sockets... etc etc.... 
> concretely.... 
> 
> ulimit -a
> cpu time               (seconds, -t)  unlimited
> file size           (512-blocks, -f)  unlimited
> data seg size           (kbytes, -d)  33554432
> stack size              (kbytes, -s)  524288
> core file size      (512-blocks, -c)  unlimited
> max memory size         (kbytes, -m)  unlimited
> locked memory           (kbytes, -l)  unlimited
> max user processes              (-u)  89999
> open files                      (-n)  3763710
> virtual mem size        (kbytes, -v)  unlimited
> swap limit              (kbytes, -w)  unlimited
> socket buffer size       (bytes, -b)  unlimited
> pseudo-terminals                (-p)  unlimited
> kqueues                         (-k)  unlimited
> umtx shared locks               (-o)  unlimited 
> 
> Any idea mates :) ? 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> El 2022-07-05 19:40, egoitz via Info escribió: 
> 
> ATENCIÓN: este correo se ha enviado desde fuera de la organización. No pinche 
> en los enlaces ni abra los adjuntos a no ser que reconozca el remitente y 
> sepa que el contenido es seguro.
> 
> Hi again :) 
> 
> One question. I have seen that have been able to see info needed for 
> debugging this by launching master with -v or -vv. I would not like to have 
> launched that way master, because it could take months for this to reproduce. 
> I need that a user to disconnect it's sessions and to have several ones for 
> disconnect. Does exist some way, of enabling that verbosity when you know you 
> are "near" to need it, because you suspect the bug is going to happen again?. 
> Or... how could I achieve for enabling verbosity when I need it?. I think I 
> don't get that verbosity info when using debug:1 in imapd.conf... so HUP 
> signal is discarded.... 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> El 2022-06-29 15:45, egoitz via Info escribió: 
> 
> ATENCIÓN: este correo se ha enviado desde fuera de la organización. No pinche 
> en los enlaces ni abra los adjuntos a no ser que reconozca el remitente y 
> sepa que el contenido es seguro.
> 
> Hi! 
> 
> I have been looking deeply at this, at reap_child() and process_msg() and 
> this seems to be fine... so my suspect is just noise.... sorry for it... 
> 
> I'll go on trying to reproduce it.... or try enabling debug to 1 in 
> imapd.conf with a HUP signal when I have the problem.... if the suspect I had 
> that ready_works was not totally right decremented I suppose (should look 
> more deeply) that enabling debug in that moment would allow me (to see 
> ready_workers value because I see are logged with debug in master.c in some 
> place...)... 
> 
> Thanks anyway, 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> El 2022-06-22 12:58, [email protected] escribió: 
> 
> Good morning, 
> 
> I wrote to the list some time ago due to this topic. I have noted that when a 
> user asks to disconnect his/her sessions (imap sessions normally the 
> disconnected ones) after some time like an hour or a half an hour passes I 
> start having some slow responses to new connections. I have monitored them 
> and it's slightly intermittent, KO and OK of server responding alert in less 
> than 3 seconds. This intermittency lasts like 10 minutes and later the 
> response delays increase. Obviously for avoid bigger service outages I stop 
> and start Cyrus and all works fine later. 
> 
> I have been trying to figure why it could be happening because I have seen it 
> only happens when I launch TERM for a disconnection to several imap 
> proccesses (the user that requested proccesses). It doesn't happen at the 
> moment. As said for instance yesterday happened when an hour passed of the 
> disconnection. 
> 
> I don't have prefork param set in cyrus.conf, so... Cyrus spawns on demand. 
> After doing some examinations my theory is that perhaps Cyrus is not calling 
> spawn_service() every time gets needed. I would say it should happen in 
> master.c : 
> 
> 2610               if (!in_shutdown && Services[i].exec &&
> 2611                    Services[i].nactive < Services[i].max_workers &&
> 2612                    Services[i].ready_workers == 0 &&
> 2613                    y >= 0 && FD_ISSET(y, &rfds))
> 2614                {
> 2615                    /* huh, someone wants to talk to us */
> 2616                    spawn_service(i);
> 2617                } 
> 
> I think that perhaps ready_workers is not properly decremented when I launch 
> this TERM and perhaps this causes Cyrus not to spawn any new more services of 
> the kind of the terminated service. As yesterday happened in a more or less 
> peak accesses hour it needed to have more services spawned but... as it seen 
> ready_workers not to be 0 for that service... it didn't spawn new more 
> services and as consequence, connections started becoming queued in being 
> accepeted awaiting that happened when a proccess gets idle because it's 
> client has disconnected or idled timeout or imap timeout happened.... 
> 
> So, I was wondering if in reap_child() for the states SERVICE_STATE_UNKNOWN 
> and SERVICE_STATE_BUSY shouldn't be decremented the ready_workers in the 
> service struct... Concretely in master.c in : 
> 
> 1121                case SERVICE_STATE_BUSY:
> 1122                    s->nactive--;
> 1123                   if (!in_shutdown && failed) {
> 1124                       syslog(LOG_DEBUG,
> 1125                               "service %s/%s pid %d in BUSY state: "
> 1126                               "terminated abnormally",
> 1127                               SERVICEPARAM(s->name),
> 1128                               SERVICEPARAM(s->familyname), pid);
> 1129                    }
> 1130                    break;
> 1131
> 1132                case SERVICE_STATE_UNKNOWN:
> 1133                    s->nactive--;
> 1134                   syslog(LOG_WARNING,
> 1135                           "service %s/%s pid %d in UNKNOWN state: 
> exited",
> 1136                           SERVICEPARAM(s->name),
> 1137                           SERVICEPARAM(s->familyname), pid); 
> 
> Obviously, another possible solution is to specify prefork in cyrus.conf but 
> I'd rather avoid wasting memory when it's not needed... 
> 
> What's your opinion mates?. Or what do you think Ellie, Bron :) . Have you 
> ever seen something like it?. 
> 
> Cheers!

CYRUS [1] / Info / see discussions [2] + participants [3] + delivery
options [4] Permalink [5] 

Links:
------
[1] https://cyrus.topicbox.com/latest
[2] https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info
[3] https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/members
[4] https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/subscription
[5]
https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/Td155a4c12885169a-Mca972e45432c39805c877af8
------------------------------------------
Cyrus: Info
Permalink: 
https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/Td155a4c12885169a-Mcf6a7f4c353b987679454a3e
Delivery options: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/subscription

Reply via email to