TSA shuts door on private airport screening program

By Mike M. Ahlers and Jeanne Meserve, CNN
January 29, 2011 2:07 a.m. EST

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/01/29/tsa.private/index.html?hpt=T2

Washington (CNN) -- A program that allows airports to replace government 
screeners with private screeners is being brought to a standstill, just a month 
after the Transportation Security Administration said it was "neutral" on the 
program.

TSA chief John Pistole said Friday he has decided not to expand the program 
beyond the current 16 airports, saying he does not see any advantage to it.

Though little known, the Screening Partnership Program allowed airports to 
replace government screeners with private contractors who wear TSA-like 
uniforms, meet TSA standards and work under TSA oversight. Among the airports 
that have "opted out" of government screening are San Francisco and Kansas City.

The push to "opt out" gained attention in December amid the fury over the TSA's 
enhanced pat downs, which some travelers called intrusive.

Rep. John Mica, a Republican from Florida, wrote a letter encouraging airports 
to privatize their airport screeners, saying they would be more responsive to 
the public.

At that time, the TSA said it neither endorsed nor opposed private screening.

"If airports chose this route, we are going to work with them to do it," a TSA 
spokesman said in late December.

But on Friday, the TSA denied an application by Springfield-Branson Airport in 
Missouri to privatize its checkpoint workforce, and in a statement, Pistole 
indicated other applications likewise will be denied.

"I examined the contractor screening program and decided not to expand the 
program beyond the current 16 airports as I do not see any clear or substantial 
advantage to do so at this time," Pistole said.

He said airports that currently use contractor screening will continue to be 
allowed to.

Pistole said he has been reviewing TSA policies with the goal of helping the 
agency "evolve into a more agile, high-performance organization."

Told of the change Friday night, Mica said he intends to launch an 
investigation and review the matter.

"It's unimaginable that TSA would suspend the most successfully performing 
passenger screening program we've had over the last decade," Mica said Friday 
night. "The agency should concentrate on cutting some of the more than 3,700 
administrative personnel in Washington who concocted this decision, and reduce 
the army of TSA employees that has ballooned to more than 62,000."

"Nearly every positive security innovation since the beginning of TSA has come 
from the contractor screening program," Mica said.

A union for Transportation Security Administration employees said it supported 
the decision to halt the program.

"The nation is secure in the sense that the safety of our skies will not be 
left in the hands of the lowest-bidder contractor, as it was before 9/11," said 
John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees. "We 
applaud Administrator Pistole for recognizing the value in a cohesive 
federalized screening system and work force."

Advocates of private screeners say it is easier to discipline and replace 
under-performing private screeners than government ones.

But Congress members have differed over the effectiveness of private screeners.

Mica said tests show that private screeners perform "statistically 
significantly better" than government screeners in tests of airport 
checkpoints. But the Government Accountability Office says it "did not notice 
any difference" during covert checkpoint testing in 2007. Both groups failed to 
find concealed bomb components, the GAO said.

Test results are not publicly disclosed.

On Friday, Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the ranking member on the House 
Homeland Security Committee, lauded Pistole's decision.

"Ending the acceptance of new applications for the program makes sense from a 
budgetary and counter-terrorism perspective," he said in a statement.
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to