March 14, 2011
As Library E-Books Live Long, Publisher Sets Expiration Date

By JULIE BOSMAN

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/business/media/15libraries.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print

Imagine the perfect library book. Its pages don’t tear. Its spine is 
unbreakable. It can be checked out from home. And it can never get lost.

The value of this magically convenient library book — otherwise known as an 
e-book — is the subject of a fresh and furious debate in the publishing world. 
For years, public libraries building their e-book collections have typically 
done so with the agreement from publishers that once a library buys an e-book, 
it can lend it out, one reader at a time, an unlimited number of times.

Last week, that agreement was upended by HarperCollins Publishers when it began 
enforcing new restrictions on its e-books, requiring that books be checked out 
only 26 times before they expire. Assuming a two-week checkout period, that is 
long enough for a book to last at least one year.

What could have been a simple, barely noticed change in policy has galvanized 
librarians across the country, many of whom called the new rule unfair and 
vowed to boycott e-books from HarperCollins, the publisher of Doris Lessing, 
Sarah Palin and Joyce Carol Oates.

“People just felt gobsmacked,” said Anne Silvers Lee, the chief of the 
materials management division of the Free Library of Philadelphia, which has 
temporarily stopped buying HarperCollins e-books. “We want e-books in our 
collections, our customers are telling us they want e-books, so I want to be 
able to get e-books from all the publishers. I also need to do it in a way that 
is not going to be exorbitantly expensive.”

But some librarians said the change, however unwelcome, had ignited a public 
conversation about e-books in libraries that was long overdue. While librarians 
are pushing for more e-books to satisfy demand from patrons, publishers, with 
an eye to their bottom lines, are reconsidering how much the access to their 
e-books should be worth.

“People are agitated for very good reasons,” said Roberta Stevens, the 
president of the American Library Association. “Library budgets are, at best, 
stagnant. E-book usage has been surging. And the other part of it is that there 
is grave concern that this model would be used by other publishers.”

Even in the retail marketplace, the question of how much an e-book can cost is 
far from settled. Publishers resisted the standard $9.99 price that Amazon once 
set on many e-books, and last spring, several major publishers moved to a model 
that allows them set their own prices.

This month, Random House, the lone holdout among the six biggest trade 
publishers, finally joined in switching to the agency model. Now many newly 
released books are priced from $12.99 to $14.99, while discounted titles are 
regularly as low as $2.99.

HarperCollins, in its defense, pointed out that its policy for libraries was a 
decade old, made long before e-books were as popular as they are today. The new 
policy applies to newly acquired books. “We have serious concerns that our 
previous e-book policy, selling e-books to libraries in perpetuity, if left 
unchanged, would undermine the emerging e-book ecosystem, hurt the growing 
e-book channel, place additional pressure on physical bookstores, and in the 
end lead to a decrease in book sales and royalties paid to authors,” the 
company said in a statement.

It is still a surprise to many consumers that e-books are available in 
libraries at all. Particularly in the last several years, libraries have been 
expanding their e-book collections, often through OverDrive, a large provider 
of e-books to public libraries and schools. Nationwide, some 66 percent of 
public libraries offer free e-books to their patrons, according to the American 
Library Association.

For many libraries, interest from patrons who want to check out e-books has 
been skyrocketing. At the New York Public Library,  e-book use is 36 percent 
higher than it was only one year ago. Demand has been especially strong since 
December, several librarians said, because e-readers were popular holiday gifts.

“As our readership goes online, our materials dollars are going online,” said 
Christopher Platt, the director of collections and circulating operations for 
the New York Public Library.

In borrowing terms, e-books have been treated much like print books. They are 
typically available to one user at a time, often for a seven- or 14-day period. 
But unlike print books, library users don’t have to show up at the library to 
pick them up — e-books can be downloaded from home, onto mobile devices, 
personal computers and e-readers, including Nooks, Sony Readers, laptops and 
smartphones. (Library e-books cannot be read on Amazon’s Kindle e-reader.) 
After the designated checkout period, the e-book automatically expires from the 
borrower’s account.

The ease with which e-books can be borrowed from libraries — potentially 
turning e-book buyers into e-book borrowers — makes some publishers 
uncomfortable. Simon & Schuster and Macmillan, two of the largest trade 
publishers in the United States, do not make their e-books available to 
libraries at all.

“We are working diligently to try to find terms that satisfy the needs of the 
libraries and protect the value of our intellectual property,” John Sargent, 
the chief executive of Macmillan, said in an e-mail. “When we determine those 
terms, we will sell e-books to libraries. At present we do not.”

And those publishers that do make their e-books available in libraries said 
that the current pricing agreements might need to be updated.

Random House, for example, has no immediate plans to change the terms of its 
agreements with libraries, said Stuart Applebaum, a spokesman for the 
publisher, but has not ruled it out in the future.

“Anything we institute ahead we’d really want to talk through with the 
community and together understand what makes sense for us both,” Mr. Applebaum 
said. “We’re open to changes in the future which are in reasonable step with 
the expectations and realities of the overall library communities.”

Publishers are nervous that e-book borrowing in libraries will cannibalize 
e-book retail sales. They also lose out on revenue realized as libraries 
replace tattered print books or supplement hardcover editions with paperbacks, 
a common practice. Sales to libraries can account for 7 to 9 percent of a 
publisher’s overall revenue, two major publishers said.

But e-books have downsides for libraries, too. Many libraries dispose of their 
unread books through used-book sales, a source of revenue that unread e-books 
can’t provide.

The American Library Association has assembled two task forces to study the 
issue.

Even among the librarians who have stopped buying HarperCollins e-books, many 
said that there might have to be a compromise.

“I can see their side of it,” said Lisa Sampley, the collection services 
manager in the Springfield-Greene County Library District in Springfield, Mo. 
“I’m hoping that if other publishers try to change the model, they think about 
the libraries and how it will affect us. But I’m sure there is some kind of 
model that could work for us both.”
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to