April 12, 2011 4:00 AM PDT
Democratic senator wants Internet sales taxes

by Declan McCullagh

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20052999-281.html

A Democratic senator is preparing to introduce legislation that aims to end the 
golden era of tax-free Internet shopping.

The proposal--expected to be made public soon after Tax Day--would rewrite the 
ground rules for Internet and mail order sales by eliminating the ability of 
Americans to shop at Web sites like Amazon.com and Overstock.com without paying 
state sales taxes.

Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second most senior Senate Democrat, will introduce 
the bill after the Easter recess, a Democratic aide told CNET.

"Why should out-of-state companies that sell their products online have an 
unfair advantage over Main Street bricks-and-mortar businesses?" Durbin said in 
a speech in Collinsville, Ill., in February. "Out-of-state companies that 
aren't paying their fair share of taxes are sticking Illinois residents and 
businesses with the tab."

At the moment, Americans who shop over the Internet from out-of-state vendors 
aren't always required  to pay sales taxes at the time of purchase. 
Californians buying books from Amazon.com or cameras from Manhattan's B&H 
Photo, for example, won't pay the sales taxes at checkout time that they would 
if shopping at a local mall--which is what Durbin means by giving online 
retailers an "unfair advantage."

On the other hand, there are some 7,500 different taxing jurisdictions in the 
United States, each with a set of very precise rules describing what can and 
can't be taxed and at what rate. That makes it challenging terrain for 
retailers to navigate.

In New Jersey, for instance, bottled water and cookies are exempt from sales 
tax (PDF), but bottled soda and candy are taxable. In Rhode Island, buying a 
mink handbag is taxed, but a mink fur coat is not (PDF).

Durbin's bill will be called the Main Street Fairness Act, which follows 
legislation introduced last July in the House of Representatives bearing the 
same name. A possible co-sponsor is Sen. Mike Enzi, a Wyoming Republican who 
backed a similar proposal before and did not respond to a request for comment. 
(See related update below.)

Making matters more difficult for the pro-tax forces is the decision by Rep. 
William Delahunt, a Massachusetts Democrat, not to run for reelection last 
year. Delahunt was probably Congress' most enthusiastic proponent of Internet 
sales taxes, and it's not clear a Republican-controlled House will be as eager 
to embrace the idea.

One early indication: Rep. Dan Lungren, a California Republican, introduced 
legislation in February saying that allowing states to levy "onerous and 
burdensome sales tax collecting schemes on Internet-enabled small businesses 
that do not even reside in their state would adversely impact hundreds of 
thousands of jobs." Former GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul is one of the 
sponsors.

The Direct Marketing Association, which sued Colorado last year to block a 
state tax law from taking effect, is preparing to rally opposition to Durbin's 
legislation.

"You're just giving the states a blank check to make changes without any 
congressional oversight," says Jerry Cerasale, the DMA's senior vice president 
for government affairs. "We oppose that...We think that's abrogating the 
authority of Congress."

In response to complexity concerns, the pro-tax forces have offered a proposal 
that they hope Congress can be persuaded to adopt. The concept is called the 
Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement, which was invented in 2002 by state tax 
officials hoping to straighten out some of sales tax laws' most notorious 
convolutions.

Since then, some 24 states have signed on, either wholly or partially, to the 
agreement, meaning they have agreed to simplify their tax codes and make them 
uniform. If enough states participate, proponents believe it will ease concerns 
about complexity and make it easier to convince Congress to make sales 
collection mandatory for out-of-state retailers.

Paul Misener, vice president of public policy for Amazon, says his employer 
isn't necessarily opposed to such legislation--as long as it's crafted very 
carefully. "We've long supported a truly simple, nationwide sales tax system, 
evenhandedly applied," he says.

The current legal and political landscape was shaped by a 1992 case called 
Quill v. North Dakota, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled: "Congress is now 
free to decide whether, when, and to what extent the states may burden 
interstate mail order concerns with a duty to collect use taxes."

Under the Quill ruling, out-of-state retailers generally don't have to collect 
taxes. One exception to that rule is a legal concept called "nexus," which 
means a company can be forced to collect sales taxes if it has a sufficient 
business presence, which is why Amazon doesn't have an office in California. 
(Another exception is the sale of cigarettes, which is covered by the Jenkins 
Act.)

An important caveat is that under existing law, online purchases from sites 
like Amazon and eBay only seem to arrive tax-free. Legally, however, purchasers 
are required to pay their own state's sales tax rate--the concept is called a 
"use tax"--and then voluntarily report the amount owed at tax time. Few do. 

Support for Durbin's forthcoming legislation is likely to come from the 
Alliance for Main Street Fairness and like-minded companies including Wal-Mart 
and Best Buy.

"Big box stores love to mobilize smaller booksellers to complain about 
competing with Amazon," says Steve DelBianco, executive director of the 
NetChoice coalition, which counts eBay, Overstock.com, and Yahoo as members. 
"The irony is that those small booksellers have been clobbered by big box 
stores. The Internet's their friend."

Update 10:30 a.m. PT: I've heard back from Sen. Mike Enzi's office. It sent me 
e-mail this morning saying: "Senator Enzi plans to co-sponsor the Main Street 
Fairness bill with Senator Durbin. As far as a  timeline or drafts, you'll have 
to check with Senator Durbin's office."
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to