(of course it's still available if you know where to look. --- rick)

Report on Kabul Bank Corruption Is Classified, Taken Offline

http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2011/05/kabul_bank.html

May 10th, 2011 by Steven Aftergood

An eye-opening report on corruption in the Afghan Central Bank that was issued 
last March by the Inspector General of the U.S. Agency for International 
Development was recently removed from the USAID web site after the Agency 
decided to classify some of its published contents.

The now-classified IG report focused on the failure to discover a widespread 
pattern of fraudulent loans at the Kabul Bank which led to the diversion of 
$850 million, the near collapse in 2009 of the bank, and an ensuing national 
crisis. Employees of the Deloitte accounting firm, who were serving as advisers 
to the bank under contract to USAID, could and should have alerted the U.S. 
government to early signs of fraud, the Inspector General found, but they did 
not.  (Instead, the U.S. government learned of the bank corruption thanks to a 
February 22, 2010 story in the Washington Post.)

But in the past week or so, the March 16, 2011 USAID Inspector General report 
(pdf) was abruptly withdrawn from the Agency’s website.

Why?  Because USAID retroactively classified certain information in the report.

“At the time our report was issued, it was written utilizing information from 
non-classified sources,” said James C. Charlifue, the chief of staff of the 
USAID Office of Inspector General.  “After our report had been issued, USAID 
subsequently classified two documents that were cited in our report.  This 
action resulted in the report becoming classified and we removed it from the 
web site,” he told Secrecy News.

Depending on the precise circumstances, the classification of information that 
has already been officially released into the public domain is either 
discouraged or prohibited, not to mention futile.  According to executive order 
13526 (section 1.7c), declassified information that has already been released 
can only be reclassified with the written approval of the agency head.  
Unclassified information that has been formally released and is no longer under 
U.S. government control is supposed to be beyond the reach of the 
classification system altogether.

A spokesman for USAID did not respond to requests for comment on the decision 
to classify the information.

In the present case, the suppressed IG report remains independently available 
in its original form.  A copy was obtained by Secrecy News.  See “Review of 
USAID/Afghanistan’s Bank Supervision Assistance Activities and the Kabul Bank 
Crisis,” USAID Office of Inspector General report, March 16, 2011.

Much of the substance of the report was previously reported in “U.S. Advisers 
Saw Early Signs of Trouble at Afghan Bank” by Ernesto Londono and Rajiv 
Chandrasekaran, Washington Post, March 15, 2011; and “U.S. Agency Ends 
Accounting Firm’s Afghan Contract” by Alissa J. Rubin and James Risen, New York 
Times, March 17, 2011.

Now that the original report has been formally classified and withdrawn, “We 
plan on publishing a non-classified version of the report,” said Mr. Charlifue 
of the USAID Office of Inspector General, “which we will place on our web site.”
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to