FBI, IUP partner to create anti-terror degree program
By Mike Wereschagin
PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_746308.html#

Don't look for the new graduate degree at Indiana University of Pennsylvania in 
any school catalog.

Clearance from the FBI is a prerequisite.

With help from government threat analysts and federal law enforcement, IUP 
criminologist Dennis Giever created the Master of Science in Strategic Studies 
in Weapons of Mass Destruction. The 30-credit, multi-year course focuses on 
worst-case scenarios: radiological "dirty" bombs, power grid disruptions, 
crippling biological attacks on food and water supplies.

"It's not going to be open enrollment (or) traditional students," Giever said. 
"You worry about whether you might be teaching the wrong person this stuff."

At first, the FBI will select students from within its ranks, though Giever 
wants to open it to other law enforcement agencies. Rather than traditional 
tuition, agencies will contract with the school, paying about $300,000 a year 
for groups of 15 to 20 full-time students, according to documents submitted to 
the board of governors of the State System of Higher Education.

"The program has been kind of a dream a number of folks at Sandia (National 
Laboratories) and I have had for a number of years," Giever said. The Sandia 
labs have conducted national security-related research in the New Mexico desert 
for 60 years.

The FBI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate approached the school about 
creating a graduate-level program in 2008.

"We went to several different universities," but none had a program focusing on 
protecting national assets from WMD attacks, said Doug Perdue, chief of the 
FBI's Countermeasures and Preparedness section of the WMD directorate in 
Washington.

With the school, they developed a specialized criminology program from which 34 
agents have graduated. That coursework coalesced into a program on June 29, 
when the State System of Higher Education approved the degree.

Terrorism studies programs aren't new, though Giever said none is this 
comprehensive. Other schools created courses in reaction to 9/11 in much the 
same way Russian studies programs came into being after the onset of the Cold 
War, said Randy Law, a history professor at Birmingham-Southern College in 
Alabama and author of "Terrorism: A History."

"It's very wrapped up with the creation of new federal bureaucracies and 
Congress feeling the need to do something in the wake of 9/11 -- to act 
quickly, loudly and with a lot of money, even if we don't really know what the 
problem is," Law said.

Other programs, such as the terrorism studies certificate at Monterey Institute 
of International Studies, have been criticized as wasting time on 
low-probability events such as WMD attacks.

"It seemed ridiculous to some people. But even if the risk is really low, it's 
still good to have some people looking at it in an academic sense," said 
Charles Blair, director of the Federation of American Scientists' Terrorism 
Analysis Project.

"I've always been interested in crime prevention. If you're at the point where 
you're trying to solve (a crime), you've ultimately lost," Giever said.

Giever cited building construction. Rather than concentrating only on 
bomb-proofing a building, architects can build it far enough away from the road 
that someone can't park a truck full of explosives close enough to do real 
damage. Such a move deters people from picking the building as a target in the 
first place.

"It's called stand-off distance. Nobody thought about that until some idiot 
decided to blow up a federal building in Oklahoma," Giever said.

The FBI's WMD program began about the same time as the Oklahoma City bombing. 
It grew after 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks, and became a directorate in 
2006. More than 200 agents work in the directorate now, including a detachment 
from the bureau's intelligence division.

"Everything we do is about prevention," Perdue said. The directorate's 
responsibilities range from easy-to-conduct chemical attacks that might kill a 
dozen people to low-probability catastrophes such as nuclear attacks, he said.

The goal of the degree program, Giever said, is obscurity. The best plan 
results in nothing happening.

"There's no glory in it," Giever said. That means funding can be hard to 
obtain. "If 9/11 had never happened, there wouldn't be all this money in it, 
but we'd be a lot richer than we are right now."

Mike Wereschagin can be reached at [email protected] or 412-320-7900.
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to