Dear US media and politicians:   At the risk of sounding pedantic, this is NOT 
the same thing as "hacking the election."   Unless you have incontrovertable 
and public proof that voter-related systems in states and precincts were 
compromised, this is simply a very well-timed "run of the mill" routine sort of 
hack/disclosure .... albeit one with dramatic global effects.   --- rick


Thu Jan 5, 2017 | 6:16 AM EST
U.S. obtained evidence after election that Russia leaked emails: officials

Reuters/James Lawler Duggan +
By Arshad Mohammed and Jonathan Landay | WASHINGTON

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN14P04P

U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive 
evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from 
the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three 
U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies 
had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove 
Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic 
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

The timing of the additional intelligence is important because U.S. President 
Barack Obama has faced criticism from his own party over why it took his 
administration months to respond to the cyber attack. U.S. Senate and House 
leaders, including prominent Republicans, have also called for an inquiry.

At the same time, President-elect Donald Trump has questioned the U.S. 
intelligence community's conclusion that Russia tried to help his candidacy and 
hurt Clinton's. Russia has denied the hacking allegations.

A U.S. intelligence report on the hacking was scheduled to be presented to 
Obama on Thursday and to Trump on Friday, though its contents were still under 
discussion on Wednesday, officials said.  

They said the post-election intelligence gave the Obama administration greater 
certainty about the full role of  the Russian government in the hacking and 
leaks of documents than it had on Oct. 7, when the U.S. intelligence agencies 
had said they were "confident" Russia orchestrated the hacking.

The additional intelligence also informed U.S. President Barack Obama's 
decision to retaliate on Dec. 29 by expelling 35 suspected Russian spies and 
sanctioning two Russian spy agencies, four intelligence officers and three 
companies, a decision that capped four months of debate at the White House 
about how to respond, the officials said.

The officials declined to describe the intelligence obtained about the 
involvement of a third-party in passing on leaked material to WikiLeaks, saying 
they did not want to reveal how the U.S. government had obtained the 
information.

In an interview with Fox News, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said he did not 
receive emails stolen from the DNC and top Hillary Clinton aide John Podesta 
from "a state party." Assange did not rule out the possibility that he got the 
material from a third party.   

Trump on Wednesday sided with Assange and again questioned the U.S. 
intelligence community's conclusion that Russia tried to help his candidacy and 
hurt Clinton's.

Concern by U.S. officials over the hacking first spiked in August, when 
intelligence agencies concluded that Russian intelligence, with the direction 
of President Vladimir Putin, had been trying to disrupt and discredit the 
presidential and congressional elections.

Obama in August rejected recommendations from some of his advisors to disclose 
the Russian link and take some limited covert action as "a shot across Putin's 
bow to knock it off," one official with knowledge of the matter said.

Instead, Obama warned Putin privately, arguing that a similar private message 
to Chinese President Xi Jinping had reduced Chinese hacking into U.S. agencies 
and companies.

In October, Obama again declined to take action, arguing such a move could be 
seen as an effort to help Clinton and discredit Republican Trump, one that 
could stain a Clinton presidency, one official said.

Obama took public action on the issue only after Trump was elected and began 
disparaging the intelligence community's reporting on the Russian hacking, 
another official said.

(Additional reporting by Mark Hosenball, Warren Strobel and John Walcott; 
Editing by Kevin Krolicki and Grant McCool)
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to