DOJ Goes Way Overboard: Demands All Info On Visitors Of Anti-Trump Site

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170814/18093937998/doj-goes-way-overboard-demands-all-info-visitors-anti-trump-site.shtml

Not all search warrants are bad. Indeed, most of them are perfectly legitimate, 
and meet the qualifications under the 4th Amendment that there is probable 
cause of a crime being committed, and the warrant is narrowly tailored to seek 
out evidence to support that. But... not always. As Ken "Popehat" White 
explains in a recent blog post, the Justice Department has somehow obtained the 
mother-of-all bad search warrants while trying to track down people who were 
involved in protests of Donald Trump's inauguration back in January. The 
government has brought felony charges against a bunch of protestors from the 
inauguration, and now it appears the DOJ is going on a big fishing expedition.

As Ken notes, it's quite likely that some protestors committed crimes, for 
which they can be charged, but prosecutors in the case have decided to go 
ridiculously overbroad in trying to get any info they can find on protestors. 
They got a search warrant for the well known hosting company DreamHost, who 
hosts the site disruptj20.org (as an aside, the fact that a site like that 
doesn't default to HTTPS for all connections is really, really unfortunate, 
especially given the rest of this article). The warrant basically demands 
everything that DreamHost could possibly have on anyone who did anything on 
disruptj20, including just visiting. As White notes in his post, it's not that 
unreasonable that the DOJ sought to find out who ran the site, but now they're 
requesting basically everything, which likely includes the IP addresses of all 
visitors:

< - >

As Ken White points out, this fishing expedition by the DOJ should concern us 
all:

The Department of Justice isn't just seeking communications by the defendants 
in its case. It's seeking the records of every single contact with the site — 
the IP address and other details of every American opposed enough to Trump to 
visit the site and explore political activism. It seeks the communications with 
and through the site of everyone who visited and commented, whether or not that 
communication is part of a crime or just political expression about the 
President of the United States. The government has made no effort whatsoever to 
limit the warrant to actual evidence of any particular crime. If you visited 
the site, if you left a message, they want to know who and where you are — 
whether or not you did anything but watch TV on inauguration day. This is 
chilling, particularly when it comes from an administration that has expressed 
so much overt hostility to protesters, so relentlessly conflated all protesters 
with those who break the law, and so deliberately framed America as being at 
war with the administration's domestic enemies.

<  - >
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to