Tech Firms to Pledge Not to Assist Governments in Cyberattacks
By David E. Sanger
April 17, 2018

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/17/us/politics/tech-companies-cybersecurity-accord.html

WASHINGTON — More than 30 high-tech companies, led by Microsoft and Facebook, 
plan to announce a set of principles on Tuesday that include a declaration that 
they will not help any government — including that of the United States — mount 
cyberattacks against “innocent civilians and enterprises from anywhere,” 
reflecting Silicon Valley’s effort to separate itself from government 
cyberwarfare.

The principles, which have been circulating among senior executives in the tech 
industry for weeks, also commit the companies to come to the aid of any nation 
on the receiving end of such attacks, whether the motive for the attack is 
“criminal or geopolitical.” Although the list of firms agreeing to the accord 
is lengthy, several companies have declined to sign on at least for now, 
including Google, Apple and Amazon.

Perhaps as important, none of the signers come from the countries viewed as 
most responsible for what Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president, called in an 
interview “the devastating attacks of the past year.” Those came chiefly from 
Russia, North Korea, Iran and, to a lesser degree, China.

On Monday, American and British officials issued a first-of-its-kind joint 
warning about years of cyberattacks emanating from Russia, aimed not only at 
businesses and utilities but, in some cases, individuals and small enterprises. 
The warning was only the latest in a series about Russian threats to elections 
and electoral systems.

The impetus for the effort came largely from Mr. Smith, who has been arguing 
for several years that the world needs a “digital Geneva Convention” that sets 
norms of behavior for cyberspace just as the Geneva Conventions set rules for 
the conduct of war in the physical world. Although there was some progress in 
setting basic norms of behavior in cyberspace through a United 
Nations-organized group of experts several years ago, the movement has since 
faltered.

Mr. Smith said over the weekend that the first move needed to come from the 
American companies that often find themselves acting as the “first responders” 
when cyberattacks hit their customers. “This has become a much bigger problem, 
and I think what we have learned in the past few years is that we need to work 
together in much bigger ways,” Mr. Smith said in an interview. “We need to 
approach this in a principled way, and if we expect to get governments to do 
that, we have to start with some principles ourselves.”

Microsoft played a central role in trying to extinguish the WannaCry attack 
last year that struck the British health care system and companies around the 
world. The Trump administration, along with several other Western governments, 
later blamed that attack on North Korea. Last summer the NotPetya attack struck 
Ukraine, crippling systems throughout the country. Iran is suspected in a 
recent attack on a Saudi petrochemical plant.

Yet not all governments are likely to embrace the “Cybersecurity Tech Accord” 
in part because the principles it espouses can run headlong into their own, 
usually secret efforts to develop cyberweapons.

When Russia’s intelligence agencies obtained some of the National Security 
Agency’s secrets about its own cyberweapons, it appeared to do so by 
manipulating a virus protection program sold by Kaspersky, a Russian firm. The 
company said it knew nothing about the intrusion into its products, but 
American officials do not believe the denials and have banned Kaspersky 
products from United States government systems. Kaspersky is not a signer to 
the new accord.

Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor who leaked documents about 
surveillance programs, revealed pictures suggesting that American officials 
intercepted some hardware that came out of Cisco Systems, a major manufacturer 
of the routers and switches that make up the spine of the internet, apparently 
so the equipment directed traffic back to American intelligence agencies. There 
is no evidence that Cisco cooperated, but the publication of the photos led 
some foreign customers to believe that American equipment had been broadly 
compromised by the N.S.A.

Cisco is one of the firms that has signed the accord. Mark Chandler, Cisco’s 
general counsel, said the company believed that “we need to say we will not be 
part of any effort that will undermine the security of the web, or undermine 
those who depend on it — our customers.” Among the other signatories were Dell, 
Juniper Systems, the two parts of the recently-split Hewlett-Packard, Symantec 
and FireEye. Two foreign firms, Telephonica of Spain and Nokia of Finland, also 
signed. There are no Chinese or Russian companies on the list of initial 
signatories.

The new technology accord vows that the 31 signers “will protect against 
tampering with and exploitation of technology products and services during 
their development, design, distribution and use.” Among the companies that 
signed are Oracle, Symantec, FireEye and HP, along with the Finnish company 
Nokia and the Spanish company Telefónica.

Microsoft officials said they briefed the Trump administration on the new 
accord and heard no objections. But that may not mean much: Mr. Trump’s 
homeland security adviser, Thomas P. Bossert, who oversaw cybersecurity policy, 
was dismissed last week after John R. Bolton took over as national security 
adviser.

The cybersecurity coordinator at the White House, Rob Joyce, is widely rumored 
to be considering leaving his post and returning to the National Security 
Agency, where he ran the most elite of the cyberforces that attack foreign 
networks. If Mr. Joyce departs, the White House will have lost its two most 
senior, and most knowledgeable, cybersecurity policymakers in the span of a few 
weeks.

A version of this article appears in print on April 17, 2018, on Page B1 of the 
New York edition with the headline: Tech Joins To Rebuff Cyberwar. Order 
Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
Infowarrior@attrition.org
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to