One can only hope Congress reads the law before passing it.....like they did
with the so-called USA-"Patriot" Act back in 2001.   -rf


The Son of Patriot Act Also Rises
Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,63800,00.html

While activists and politicians work to repeal or change parts of the
Patriot Act that they say violate constitutional rights, Patriot Act II
legislation -- which caused a stir when it came to light last year -- is
rearing its head again in a new bill making its way through Congress.

< snip >

The bill, known as the Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of
2003, or HR 3179, was introduced last September by Rep. James Sensenbrenner
(R-Wisconsin) and was co-sponsored by Rep. Porter Goss (R-Florida), chairman
of the House Intelligence Committee and a possible contender to replace
departing CIA chief George Tenet.

It contains four sections that first appeared in a proposed piece of
legislation dubbed Patriot Act II. That proposed law was discovered last
year by the Center for Public Integrity just weeks before the invasion of
Iraq. Patriot Act II, or "Son of Patriot" as critics called it, was written
by the Justice Department to expand Patriot Act powers, but the department
was forced to shelve the proposal after news of it created an uproar.

< snip >

In total, six bills pending in Congress contain provisions taken from
Patriot Act II. In addition to HR 3179, three other House bills (and two
Senate companion bills) were introduced late last year:

    * HR 3179: Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003
    * HR 3037: Anti-Terrorism Tools Enhancement Act of 2003
    * HR 2934 and S 1604: Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act of 2003
    * HR 3040 and S 1606: Pretrial Detention and Lifetime Supervision of
Terrorists Act of 2003.


--
You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit 
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message 
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights 
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to