----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:56:00 PM > Subject: Re: Fwd: Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval > > On 11/26/2012 07:51 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > > Hi Doron, > > > > On 11/26/2012 04:41 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote: > >> I've been getting this too much lately... > >> > >> Currently I'm having a discussion with ~9 people. > >> Is this reason really needed? > >> If so, can we increase the # to something reasonable? Let's say > >> 20? > > > > May I ask, is everyone in the discussion registered for the list? > > If so, > > perhaps you can avoid including them all in the "To:" or "CC:" > > lines? > > > > 20 people CCed is a lot for a mailing list. 10 sounds much more > > reasonable to me. > > > > We can also change the mailing list rules to remove members of the > > list > > from the CC list of emails you get - this should ensure that only > > people > > who are not subscribed to the list stay CCed. >
Dave, that's a good question, which I thought of before writing my initial mail. The simple answer is: "I don't know for sure". Actually is there a way for me to list the members of a specific list? I know there are many users in subscribed to relevant lists (for vdsm, infra, etc), but removing one or more from a thread can actually become an insult. So as a habit I really prefer to avoid it. I really hope that 10 recipients along with mailman removing redundancy will do the trick. > Ooh, I didn't know Mailman would do that, that's a great idea. (I > always > like to remove all the extra recipients, but sometimes you don't know > who is on the list or not.) > +20 > What setting is that? > > - Karsten > -- > Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth > http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com > @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
