On 11/28/2012 11:44 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 11/27/2012 04:29 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which
repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize
for me name of repos and maintainers for each.
We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think?
At the least, I think we need:
web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks
I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web.
infra-website sounds good to me - combine the suggestions. :)
For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git
before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe
we need a source control for that anyway?
I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need
those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files
in our scripts repo or something.
infra-puppet?
Right, so all scripts Puppet is going to run come from infra-puppet. We
can make a yum repo of RPMs later, if needed. Is that correct?
infra_scripts: (all of Infra team)
How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more
consistent with other repositories that also use a dash.
Nope, you are correct - infra-scripts is better.
Anything else we're missing here?
For maintainers:
infra-website
Mike Burns
Eyal Edri
Itamar Heim
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
Robert Middleswarth
Ofer Schreiber
Karsten Wade
Dave Neary
Garrett Lesage
Jason Brooks
infra-scripts
Mike Burns
Eyal Edri
Itamar Heim
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
Robert Middleswarth
Ofer Schreiber
Karsten Wade
infra-puppet
Mike Burns
Eyal Edri
Itamar Heim
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
Robert Middleswarth
Ofer Schreiber
Karsten Wade
just ping me when these are final and i'll create them.
thanks
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
