On 04/03/2013 12:02 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote: > I vote for <non_descriptive_name_of_function> as a hostname, first of all.
Meaning, we pick a theme and name hosts based on that? Flowers, baked goods, Asgardians, etc. I suppose I'm the one who starting us on the <name_by_location> and generally supported <descriptive_name_of_function>. Curious what your objection is to the latter? I think engine.alterway.ovirt.org has a nice flow to it, but I like long subdomains. :) - Karsten > But to keep with the theme of what we have, I vote for engine01 or > manager01 or whatever. > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden < > ewoud+ov...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:05:07AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote: >>> I'm guessing we'd want to give the instance a proper fqdn -> >>> "manager01.ovirt.org", "engine.ovirt.org" ? >> >> I dislike those options. manager01 (to me) implies a cluster where each >> managerXX is a node. engine implies there is only one which won't be >> true since we'll set up another engine at rackspace. I'd prefer to have >> one, but as far as I know this is currently not possible (and maybe due >> to latency even a bad idea). >> >> How about engine.alterway.ovirt.org, engine-alterway.ovirt.org or >> alterway-engine.ovirt.org? >> _______________________________________________ >> Infra mailing list >> Infra@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > Infra@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra