----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <[email protected]> > To: "Kiril Nesenko" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 9:34:25 PM > Subject: Re: Joining Infra team > > On 05/07/2013 04:36 AM, Kiril Nesenko wrote: > > We need to update this page - > > http://www.ovirt.org/Infrastructure_team_administrators > > 1. rmiddle - is not active anymore > > We don't have any current policy about inactivating members. Did Robert > send out email saying he was no longer active, remove him as a > maintainer, etc.? > > This page doesn't mention anything about inactivity: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Becoming_a_maintainer
IIUC, the above page talks about pkgs maintainers and not infra. I think we should look at http://www.ovirt.org/Becoming_an_Infrastructure_team_member > > It may simply be up to us to decide if we want a policy around > inactivity. It seems to make sense that Infrastructure would be more > strict around this - unlike code contribution under git, root access to > servers can be destructive if an inactive Infra member has their key > compromised, etc. We should have such policy for sure. > > > 2. oschreib - is not maintaining infra > > He was at one point, probably when we formed the Infra group. As above, > we don't have any policy for this. > > If we're worried about proliferation of sshkeys with sudo access and > less active Infra members, perhaps we can control specifically who has > access to what rather than "everyone, everything." If someone goes > inactive we can remove their sshkey access, but leave the rest (user ~/, > voting privileges, etc.) +1 > > I recall asking Carl Trieloff about this when he and JimJag were > drafting the initial governance for oVirt. I was worried that a Board > and maintainers that grew without much attrition would be unwieldy. They > reassured me it worked out fine - there is no reason to retire people, > if they are not active then they just stop debating and voting, but they > can always come back as per the merit that got them maintainership in > the first place. I haven't seen so far a reason to doubt their reasoning. The purpose of maintainer is to be active as much as possible and to be involved in most infra tasks/changes/designs. Maintainer needs to attend meetings in a weekly basis, etc... So if the person who was a maintainer is inactive anymore, so we should change his status - to apprentice(for example) etc... But as you mentioned, we need a policy for that. [Adding Carl] > > > 3. Need to add obasan as apprentice. > > So far it appears that new apprentices are added by suggesting of an > existing maintainer. Perhaps we want to make that a more formal > sponsorship arrangement? Each new apprentice needs a sponsor to help get > them started, etc. That's how it should work ! +1 > > Cheers - Karsten > > > Ohad, please post your ssh pub key. > > > > - Kiril > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 12:07:43 AM > >> Subject: Re: Joining Infra team > >> > >> On 05/06/2013 01:26 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I updated the "Joining the infra team" wiki page earlier todday with my > >>> ubnderstanding of what was discussed and agreed several months ago. > >>> Please have a look and review it (and edit it in place), as it's > >>> entirely possible I've forgotten important things there. > >>> http://www.ovirt.org/Becoming_an_Infrastructure_team_member > >> > >> Great, thanks. I just threw in some changes and additions, let me know > >> what you think. Mainly I wanted to give more stuff to do as an apprentice. > >> > >> One thing that isn't addressed is the final step, which I briefly > >> touched upon in my update. How do we want to handle proposing that > >> apprentices move to maintainership? Just when it occurs to us? On a > >> quarterly basis? When someone asks for the switch and it's obviously > >> time to do it? > >> > >> In that vein, how do I propose that Alexander Rydekull and Dave Neary be > >> pulled from apprentice to maintainer? Presuming they also feel ready, etc. > >> > >> Moran, are you still active and interested? I've lost track of who on > >> the team from Red Hat Engineering is working on Infrastucture bits > >> quietly ... > >> > >> - Karsten > >> -- > >> Karsten 'quaid' Wade > >> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com > >> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Infra mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >> > > > -- > Karsten 'quaid' Wade > http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com > @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
