On Thu 21 Nov 2013 03:03:00 PM CET, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/21/2013 03:29 PM, Ohad Basan wrote: >> +1 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:27:39 PM >>> Subject: Puppet environment name / branch name >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just deployed r10k to be the deployment method and it works generally >>> well. One problem is that it maps branches one to one. Currently I >>> worked around this by making a symlink, but I think we should rename our >>> master branch to production. Opinions? > > is that common? usually master is named master. > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
Maybe it's better to change puppet config to use master as the 'production' environment source of manifests. I say that because it's usually a mess to have a branch that it's not the master as master... (@work we use development as master in one of the repos, and I always submit a patch or two a month to master instead xd) -- David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Email: [email protected] Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
