I moved the 3.3.2 content to the stable, should be ok now. Once I will finish with upstream builds/releases/repos reorganization things will be much more clear than today.
Kiril ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]> > To: "Eyal Edri" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Sandro Bonazzola" <[email protected]>, "infra" <[email protected]>, > "Kiril Nesenko" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2014 8:47:44 PM > Subject: Re: release repo structure and 3.3.2 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eyal Edri" <[email protected]> > > To: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>, "infra" <[email protected]>, "Kiril > > Nesenko" <[email protected]>, "Sandro > > Bonazzola" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2014 8:46:39 PM > > Subject: Re: release repo structure and 3.3.2 > > > > current layout for stable is mostly links to 3.3 dir: > > > > # tree > > . > > |-- iso -> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/iso > > |-- rpm > > | |-- EL -> /var/www/html/releases/3.3/rpm/EL > > | `-- Fedora > > | |-- 17 -> /var/www/html/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17 > > | |-- 18 -> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/rpm/Fedora/18 > > | `-- 19 -> /var/www/html/releases/3.3/rpm/Fedora/19 > > |-- src -> /var/www/html/releases/3.3/src > > `-- tools -> /var/www/html/releases/3.3/tools > > > > so i guess the links should be updates to point to 3.3.2 dir instead of 3.3 > > This method will not allow people to rollback. > We should have single repo with rolling rpms, keeping previous released ones. > > > > > Eyal. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>, "infra" <[email protected]>, "Kiril > > > Nesenko" <[email protected]> > > > Cc: "Sandro Bonazzola" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2014 7:55:19 PM > > > Subject: Re: release repo structure and 3.3.2 > > > > > > On 01/01/2014 11:42 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > For some reason there 3.3.2 z-stream was released in its own repository > > > > so > > > > people that are subscribed to stable[1] did not get it. > > > > > > > > There is no much sense in releasing fix release that people do not get > > > > in > > > > simple "yum update". > > > > > > > > Also the following is now broken of most packages' spec: > > > > Source0: > > > > http://ovirt.org/releases/stable/src/@PACKAGE_NAME@-@[email protected] > > > > > > > > For each minor we should have rolling repository, to reduce noise and > > > > provide service. > > > > > > > > All released tarballs (sources) should be stored at fixed location to > > > > allow > > > > distro specific code to fetch, the location must be synced with what we > > > > publish. > > > > > > > > Immediate action is to move the 3.3.2 content into the stable > > > > directory. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Alon Bar-Lev. > > > > > > > > [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/stable/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Infra mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > > > > > > > > > > kiril - was this fixed? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Infra mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
