is it relevant only for f19 machines? or any fedora slave? e.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ohad Basan" <[email protected]> > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Eyal Edri" <[email protected]>, "VDSM Project Development" > <[email protected]>, "Vered Volansky" > <[email protected]>, "infra" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:14:56 AM > Subject: Re: fedora19 needs the new glusterfs repo for certain CI jobs > > sent a patch for that > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/24510/ > please review > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]> > > To: "Eyal Edri" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Ohad Basan" <[email protected]>, "VDSM Project Development" > > <[email protected]>, "Vered > > Volansky" <[email protected]>, "infra" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 12:42:09 AM > > Subject: Re: fedora19 needs the new glusterfs repo for certain CI jobs > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:30:21AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Ohad Basan" <[email protected]> > > > > To: "Vered Volansky" <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: "infra" <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:04:13 PM > > > > Subject: Re: fedora19 needs the new glusterfs repo for certain CI jobs > > > > > > > > I think that what has to be done here is that we need to add to puppet > > > > the > > > > gluster upstream repository. > > > > opinions anyone? > > > > > > you're talking about the glusterfs epel repos? > > > fine by me, but adding vdsm devel to confirm. > > > > > > Yes, please pull in > > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-19/aarch64/ > > > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
