Hello All, I might guess that maybe there was some problem with PTR record for 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:4b0d at that time so it might be affecting gmail spam scoring, however this is a very wild guess as right now PTR is correctly pointing back to lists.ovirt.org.
SPF is set per domain name as I see, not per IP address so it includes all IPs that DNS name resolves automatically. Maybe we need to revise the current settings against the recommendations for bulk senders: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en I guess other mail services might use same scoring approaches. Anton. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Karsten Wade <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/24/2016 01:32 AM, David Caro wrote: > > Maybe it's old enough so Quaid was involved back then? > > I don't recall for sure why IPv6 would be turned off, but iirc we had > problems with SPF for a few years for gmail.com users, meaning it > affected the end-users mailing lists the most. > > Is it possible SPF was turned off for IPv4 & IPv6, then the problem > with SPF and GMail was fixed, and it was turned back on but only for IPv > 4? > > How about experimenting and see what happens (SCIENCE!), maybe with a > warning to the two main lists (devel, users) in case anything breaks? > > Best, > > - - Karsten > - -- > Karsten Wade > Community Infra & Platform (Mgr) > Open Source and Standards, @redhatopen > @quaid gpg: AD0E0C41 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAldEqmQACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEF/1gCdGlAbok+hxemOK+WwXvFZ3p9/ > AgAAn0FTmmYDdYiwocVO934JJvkav0Ui > =tXyn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > -- Anton Marchukov Senior Software Engineer - RHEV CI - Red Hat
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
