On 11 July 2016 at 23:12, Dan Kenigsberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357
>
> Francesco, shouldn't vdsm require virtlogd explicitly?
>
This is unrelated to this thread.
The discussion here is about configuration on Lago hosts, they are not
running vdsm...


-- 
Barak Korren
[email protected]
RHEV-CI Team
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Reply via email to