On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Eyal Edri <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Eyal Edri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Barak Korren <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 25 June 2017 at 09:38, Eyal Edri <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Barak Korren <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> בתאריך 23 ביוני 2017 15:56, "Sandro Bonazzola" <[email protected]> >>>>> כתב: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> we dropped publishing vdsm ppc64le builds on snapshot repos due to >>>>> issues keeping aligned nvr between x86_64 and ppc64le. >>>>> >>>>> Today we're still missing ppc64le builds on >>>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/ >>>>> >>>>> Where do we stand with the support for the build of the same nvr ob >>>>> both arches? >>>>> >>>>> Can we get it re-enabled? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes. We solved the issues we had with this a while ago with the new >>>>> deploy-to-expetimental job. Are you sure the ppc64le builds are not making >>>>> it to 'tested'? (Im assuming the builds themselves are enabled...) >>>>> >>>>> I suppose the situation with 4.1 is a little different because it is >>>>> not taking stuff from 'tested' yet... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sent [1], which should solve it. >>>> Barak, the fact that we still publish nightly to 4.1 in the old way can >>>> somehow still cause issues for publishing both ppc64le and x86_64? >>>> The only thing I can think of is if for a very slim chance, one of the >>>> builds of vdsm is running during the time publisher works resulting in a >>>> mismatch in the repo, right? >>>> >>>> >>> Yeah, not very probable. >>> >>> Maybe we should just clean up the publishers and move 4.1 to use >>> 'tested' too. Do we have a ticket about that? >>> >> >> https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1477 >> >> But I don't see a good reason to push it forward unless we hit a problem >> or blocker, it might cause issues like we've seen in master and also >> there is a good chance 4.1 still has old non-standard CI projects that >> will make it impossible to finish, unless we migrate them to standard CI >> (which also might not be worth the effort). >> >> Bottom line, good to have a ticket on it, we'll do if we see its needed >> at some point. >> > > > Verified we have ppc64le on 4.1-snapshot: > > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/ > > > BTW, we're still building and publishing qemu-kvm-rhev to 4.1, i'm > assuming the latest change to pick it up from kvm-common was for master > only? > Yes, there was a bug for 4.2. > > > >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Barak Korren >>> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi >>> Red Hat EMEA >>> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Eyal edri >> >> >> ASSOCIATE MANAGER >> >> RHV DevOps >> >> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D >> >> >> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> >> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> >> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> >> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >> > > > > -- > > Eyal edri > > > ASSOCIATE MANAGER > > RHV DevOps > > EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D > > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> > phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
