[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35473#comment-35473
]
Barak Korren commented on OVIRT-1788:
-------------------------------------
[[email protected]] I don't know enough about how to use Selenium to iterate
on this on my own, so I'll try to guide you through what I think is needed to
be done. If you want more hand-on help from me, you'll need to teach me a
little about Selenium and perhaps give me a small example app I can iterate
with...
Here are the things that need to be done
# Enable the OST suit to use docker - this is done by:
## Adding '{{docker}}' to the '{{*.packages}}' file of the suit
## Adding '{{docker}}' to the '{{*.packages}}' file of '{{check-patch}}' (So
code changes to the suit can be tested).
## Add the following to the relevant '{{*.mounts}}' files
{code}/var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock{code}
# Start up the Selenium containers from inside the suit and make them able to
talk to oVirt. The readme of the GitHub repo gives examples of '{{docker}}'
commands doing that, but those use the deprecated '{{--link}}' option. I've
looked at what the containers actually do, and is seems that the browser
containers simply expect the '{{HUB_PORT_4444_TCP_ADDR}}' and
'{{HUB_PORT_4444_TCP_PORT}}' environment variables to be defined for them and
pointing to the hub container.
A more modern approach to setting this up would be:
## Setup a Docker network to connect the containers together
## Setup the hostnames for the oVirt VMs in the Docker network
## Start up a hub container and expose port 4444 so test suits can connect to
it.
## Start up the browser containers and configure the env vars for then so they
can find the hub container
The above could be done with a bunch of Docker commands, but a better
approach would be to use an automation tool such as '{{docker-compose}}'. But
given that Ansible is closer to home for us, and likely to be used by other
oVirt components, I think '{{ansible-containers}}' would be a better choice
here.
> new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-1788
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: OST
> Reporter: Greg Sheremeta
> Assignee: infra
>
> I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open
> headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things
> look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually
> add chromium, which can run headless now too.
> The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test
> machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required,
> geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged.
> Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56,
> /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes
> sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this.
> Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want
> to avoid copr.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
