On 02/02/10 16:22, Ricky Zhou wrote:
If the score originates from com2com scoring, then the filter needs fixing, as it did not look for \.com but anything com. This looks more like a bug that needs to be submitted to the relevant developers.On 2010-02-02 03:02:18 PM, Tristan Santore wrote:I like the spam headers, and have yet to see a single message marked as spam, which originated from a user. And I am on multiple lists. Also, without the headers of the message, it is hard to say what is causing said scoring. It could be the users end or maybe even their fault, i.e. using a SMTP they should not. As it happened to one of my clients. Also, just because it is marked [spam], does not mean it gets removed, and I believe most people can use common sense in that regard.Todd attached the message and full headers, and in this case, it seems that the presence of a domain name with ".com" in the middle caused a huge spam score, which definitely seems unreasonable.I agree with Todd that the spam headers suffice without having to munge the subject. Thanks, Ricky_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Regards, Tristan -- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 [email protected] Former Thawte Notary (Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down, and I am therefor no longer able to accredit trust) For Fedora related issues, please email me at: [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
