On Jan 21, 2014 2:42 PM, "Luke Macken" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > So, what I would like to ask is: > > * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not? > > Love it. Totally worth pursuing :) > > > * Where should it live? > > I'm all for keeping it distro-agnostic, but having a Powered by OpenShift > button on there couldn't hurt :P
+11 -AdamM > > > * Domain name suggestions? (release-monitoring.org, cnucnu.org, cnucnuweb.org, > > <insert here you own idea>?) > > release-monitoring.org is decent, anything with the name cnucnu in it > will be confusing, but part of me thinks it should contain the word > upstream. > > Do you envision any sort of API for this? We've wanted to have an 'Upstream > Summary' section in the fedora-packages app for a while now. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Packager#Package_details_.3E_overview > So having an API that we could hit to get the SCM type/url and latest version > would be nice :) > > It also feels like cnucnu is the Right Place to house DOAP metadata ;) > > luke > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
