On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:41:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> pkgdb
> 07.09.52      pkgdb01.phx2.fedoraproject.org  Jun 30 2014 07:13:00    4       
> CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry pkgdb configuration task_userid:root
> 07.09.52      pkgdb01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org      Jun 30 2014 07:13:00    
> 4       CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry pkgdb configuration 
> task_userid:root
> 07.09.52      pkgdb02.phx2.fedoraproject.org  Jun 30 2014 07:13:01    4       
> CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry pkgdb configuration task_userid:root
[...]
> nuancier
> 06.35.07      nuancier01.phx2.fedoraproject.org       Jun 30 2014 06:37:38    
> 4       CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry nuancier configuration      
> task_userid:root
> 06.35.07      nuancier01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org   Jun 30 2014 06:37:38    
> 4       CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry nuancier configuration      
> task_userid:root
> 06.35.07      nuancier02.phx2.fedoraproject.org       Jun 30 2014 06:37:38    
> 4       CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry nuancier configuration      
> task_userid:root
> 06.35.07      nuancier02.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org   Jun 30 2014 06:37:38    
> 4       CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED      copy sundry nuancier configuration      
> task_userid:root

These are "normal".
Both application have an admin DB user and a regular DB user. What the playbook
does is:
- set up pkgdb/nuancier with the admin DB user
- create the DB or create new tables, or nothing if it is all already there
- update the configuration files to use the regular DB user so that this is the
  under-priviledge user used by the application in normal condition

I guess we could:
- Drop step 1 and 2
or
- Make step 1 and 2 rely on a CLI argument


Pierre

Attachment: pgpMuDfArIpVx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Reply via email to