+1 for thsi change. Should be easy to unbreak.

On 1 December 2014 at 12:31, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:

> We currently have a hotfix for python-bugzilla in puppet.
>
> This is breaking the newer version of python-bugzilla that reviewstatus
> uses. ie, if we update to the newer version it's got this hotfix
> against the old version it breaks.
>
> tibbs investigated and this hotfix is no longer needed against the
> newer version.
>
> So, I would like to drop the hotfix, and update to the new version and
> see if reviewstats is happy as I hope it will be. It shouldn't affect
> anything release blocking, but would be nice to fix.
>
> Related ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4429
>
> +1s?
>
> kevin
> --
> diff --git a/modules/hotfix/manifests/init.pp
> b/modules/hotfix/manifests/init.pp
> index a12b063..ae7850f 100644
> --- a/modules/hotfix/manifests/init.pp
> +++ b/modules/hotfix/manifests/init.pp
> @@ -142,10 +142,6 @@ class hotfix::fas_client {
>  }
>
>  class hotfix::python-bugzilla {
> -    file { "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bugzilla/base.py":
> -        source => 'puppet:///hotfix/python-bugzilla/base.py',
> -        mode => '0644'
> -    }
>  }
>
>  class hotfix::python-logging {
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Reply via email to