Very true.. expanding the dev base I think is the key you are looking for. Need to throw more bodies at it :) Could open up possible mentoring activities but with time being short all around, that might not be viable.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Randy Barlow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 12:43 -0600, InvalidPath wrote: > > Is the pool of code reviewer small? Maybe another unspoken rule of > > the 'first responder's' to code reviews are the ones who deal with > > the code in question, primarily? Does that make sense? You deal with > > Bodhi so you'd obviously jump on those CR's whereas someone like > > Nirik might be a guru with.. Ansible would jump on those. > > That might introduce another layer of complexity though, just spit > > balling. > > I do tend to be the main person that reviews Bodhi PRs, and that's > probably good since I know it well. I'm more thinking about the quality > of reviews I can give to other people who know their code the best. For > example, if I review a Pagure PR for Pierre-Yves I feel unable to give > the level of quality I am able to give on Bodhi PRs. And probably > nobody can review that code as well as he can. > > This probably stems from the fact that we have many tens of projects, > and not many tens of developers. Thus, there are many projects that > only really have one person that knows it well. > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists. > fedoraproject.org > >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
