On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 04:28:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I would like to change the setup of our mirror crawler and just wanted
> > to mention my planned changes here before working on them.
> > 
> > Currently we have two VMs which are crawling our mirrors. Each of the
> > machine is responsible for one half of the active mirrors. The crawl
> > starts every 12 hours on the first crawler and 6 hours later on the
> > second crawler. So every 6 hours one crawler is accessing the database.
> > 
> > Currently most of the crawling time is not spent crawling but updating
> > the database about which host has which directory up to date. With a
> > timeout of 4 hours per host we are hitting that timeout on some hosts
> > regularly and most of the time the database access is the problem.
> > 
> > What I would like to change is to crawl each category (Fedora Linux,
> > Fedora Other, Fedora EPEL, Fedora Secondary Arches, Fedora Archive)
> > separately and at different times and intervals.
> > 
> > We would not hit the timeout as often as now as only the information for
> > a single category has to be updated. We could scan 'Fedora Archive' only
> > once per day or every second day. We can scan 'Fedora EPEL' much more
> > often as it is usually really fast and get better data about the
> > available mirrors.
> > 
> > My goal would be to distribute the scanning in such a way to decrease
> > the load on the database and to decrease the cases of mirror
> > auto-deactivation due to slow database accesses. 
> > 
> > Let me know if you think that these planned changes are the wrong
> > direction of if you have other ideas how to improve the mirror crawling.
> 
> Sounds like all great ideas to me. ;)

Thanks.

> I wonder if we could also find some way to note which mirrors have
> iso/image files, and could communicate this to the
> download.fedoraproject.org redirect to only redirect people to mirrors
> that have that specific file if they are pointing to an iso/qcow2, etc.

This is one of the cases where MirrorManager, in theory, should almost
handle it correctly. The important part of this sentence is 'in theory'.
MirrorManager should know about the 3 most recent files in a directory
and if we are crawling via rsync we even download the complete listing
for a mirror. So besides the theory it would help to see a wrong
redirect live to understand why it is happening.

                Adrian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to