Undo. Wrong message to +1 as I haven't read this part yet.

On 25 April 2018 at 16:11, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am +! to this.
>
> On 25 April 2018 at 16:06, Dusty Mabe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/25/2018 04:00 PM, Patrick  マルタインアンドレアス  Uiterwijk wrote:
>>> No, because the logger.info statements also output things like what the 
>>> current state is, and we explicitly set logging to ERROR to only catch the 
>>> errors.
>>> I want these specific output messages to print whatever the log level is 
>>> set to.
>>
>> yeah I understand. It's just not clear to someone coming into the code later 
>> why they
>> exist and $newuser would probably just convert them to logger.info calls and 
>> not know any better.
>>
>> I'd prefer if we converted any logger.info calls that we don't want to print 
>> out by default to
>> logger.debug and then make just these be logger.info and then set the 
>> loglevel to INFO. Would
>> probably be the best approach to prevent a new person from coming in and 
>> deleting/converting the
>> print statements.
>>
>> Dusty
>> _______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to