On 11/26/18 1:59 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 8:08 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 11/21/18 3:11 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> >>> Dne 20. 11. 18 v 23:52 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): >>> Was this resolved? >>> >>> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7671 >> >> I thought so, but the builds there have their logs cleaned up and the >> devel spec no longer has this in it. >> I tried a test package that I scratch built and it seemed to work fine. >> (ie, when I had ExclusiveArch: noarch aarc64 it always went to a aarch64 >> builder). > > "ExclusiveArch: aarch64" works while "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" does not. > The problem is that Koji may try to build packages with > "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" in i386 chroot. This is not fixed AFAIK. A fix > would be splitting x86_64/i386 hosts into two distinct groups and > assigning exactly one arch to each builder.
That seems very odd to me. Do you have an example build of this? Shouldn't mock pass the right thing here? kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
