On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:57:22AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 11:52, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 05:15, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sure which value would you suggests ? > > > > > > We have the data*, we should just look at it :) > > > > > > * We have stored the time it took to query greenwave for each of the 1500+ > > > updates from bodhi we've tested (83 of which have more than one build), > > > so we > > > should be able to look at it and see if there something in there to help > > > us make > > > a reasonable decision. > > > > > > > If you aim me at the data I can help come up with some valid numbers.. > > and I would suggest that we look at a 80% fit. If we find a number > > which meets 80% of queries then we are good. > > Thanks smooge. > > For the record the data location was shared on IRC.
The location shared on IRC isn't accessible to everyone, but the data is also publicly accessible in: https://pagure.io/cpe/bodhi_greenwave_investigation/ and more precisely, all the results are in: https://pagure.io/cpe/bodhi_greenwave_investigation/blob/master/f/results Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
