Is there an ETA for the next vacuum process? If we can wait for some
months it might worth to upgrade to newer rhel and postgres after dc
migration but before next autovacuum process instead of lowering now the
max age and forcing another autovacuum process with current old postgres
20/3/4 09:41(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 22:39, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And our lazyness and indecision pays off!
The autovac is finally done and load should be back to normal.
Should we lower down the autovacuum max age ? so that next times it runs
it does not take that long ?
I am going to re-enable backups.
Thanks everyone.
kevin
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list --
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
