I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access to herlo's repo so I could update it. Now I have commit access to herlo's repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what it hurts). I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked to anywhere before we delete it.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:38 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > We have 134 projects there: > > > - 45 of them are archived > > > - 1 is a mirror > > > - people2 > > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > > > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > > > - Last commit on November 2020 > > > - Seems up to date with its parent project > > > > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info? > > But in any case I don't think we need it now. > > > > > - pyramid_fas_openid > > > - master branch > > > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > > > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > > - develop branch > > > - last commits 2015 > > > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > > > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. > > At least bodhi-backend01 has: > > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch > > installed. > > Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork? > > > > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may > want to > > > find a better place: > > > - asknot-ng > > > - fedbages > > > - tahrir > > > - tahrir-api > > > > Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere... > > > > > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of > which are > > > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. > > > > Still a lot. ;) > > yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of > "artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results > in > two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them > up a > little more :) > > > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to > another > > > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. > > > > We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know > > if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can. > > Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way > to hide > archived project by default I think that would be sufficient. > Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default > rather than 134. > > Hoping it makes sense :) > > > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to > [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
