> > > > Should there be an announcement or at least a ping of other group > managers just to make sure there are no objections? While unlikely, > I'm a little concerned that a rogue group manager could cause some > harm on their way out the door, for example. > > I think a good solution for this would be needing +1s on the ticket from group members before it can be deleted, with a few possible exceptions of old groups with only 1 or 2 people in them.
> We now have 5 requests to remove various no longer used groups. > > I've enabled audit logging on our ipa01 instance, so we have audit logs > (and I intend to back them up and keep them forever). So we can tell > when a group was deleted by whom. We also have a db dump from fas2 > before the switchover where we can look at who was in what group or what > created it. > > So, I would like to propose: > > * we will remove groups on request/ticket from a group manager. > * we will not seek out groups to remove, as them being there doesn't > really hurt anything. > > Thoughts? Otherwise I think if we have the audit log then we should be free to delete the groups as needed. It will likely be a rare request in future, the new account system has triggered a spring clean I think. Mark
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
