It appears that the conversion fo python3 on fedbages was done about a
year ago -- but never released or deployed into production.

There is some discussion on this ticket here:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151

and also an infra ticket here:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10192

cheers,
ryanlerch

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:25 PM Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ <lxt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or
> >> semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s).
> >>
> >> The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the
> >> datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora
> >> Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case.
> >>
> >> The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact
> >> with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database.
> >> However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB
> >> using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too,
> >> obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than
> >> using datanommer
> >>
> >> This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as
> >> the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is
> >> all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to
> >> update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should
> >> be hunky-dory.
> >>
> >> However, neither of these applications are running currently on
> >> staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out.
> >>
> >> Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish
> >> maintainers of these items so we can discuss further.
> >>
> > Hey Ryan,
> >
> > We can for sure work something out and update the necessary bits.
> > Would you mind opening up a ticket and mentioning me so I can look at this?
>
> Ok -- we have this ticket open on datanommer if that helps:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151
>
> cheers,
> ryanlerch
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to