On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:53:08AM -0000, Kamil Páral wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > If I understood correctly, you can request more than 20 results, but if you > > don't specify how many you want, you'll only get 20. > > Pierre is right, requesting more results seems to be working fine, in my > local testing. So I'd bump it to 100, personally, that seems like a > reasonable value for our use cases. > > > I believe if you set it to 0 you may get everything, but this needs to be > > confirmed empirically. > > I only tested with a small dataset (~35 results), and the request with > limit=0 returned the whole set. I guess there might be some hard cap on this, > so you can't request the whole Bugzilla. But I wouldn't go this way anyway, > using pagination is more server friendly, I believe. > > > Looks alright to me otherwise. > > Can we please get one more ack? Blockerbugs app is quite vital for QA at this > point of the release cycle, and the sudden Bugzilla pagination change caught > us with our pants down :-) Currently it doesn't update properly. Thanks.
+1 to update it. I'd also suggest 100 since 0 might have some unknown limit on it. :) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
