On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 16:10, Stephen Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is a general 'what I am seeing in the infrastructure' email taking
> various comments I made in irc into a more formal email
>
>
>
Looking at the last month of mailing lists which archived mails, we have
about 120 email out of 700+ email lists which got at least one email. The
40 most active emails in August to beginning of September were
36148 scm-commits
2178 package-announce
1737 go-sig
1729 package-review
1163 rust-sig
1145 python-sig
864 devel
786 releng-cron
676 gnome-sig
449 epel-package-announce
441 perl-devel
419 neuro-sig
344 users
318 epel-packagers-sig
317 infra-sig
313 kde-sig
313 arch-excludes
289 container-sig
229 test-reports
192 deepinde-sig
186 ruby-packagers-sig
156 virt-maint
151 kernel
141 fedoramagazine-tips
126 freeipa-users
124 perl-maint
108 epel-devel
104 rpm-software-management
102 openstack-sig
101 meetingminutes
98 test
97 i18n-bugs
97 certbot-sig
86 kexec
75 java-sig-commits
67 dns-sig
50 nodejs-sig
45 lvm2-commits
45 infrastructure
44 389-users
I am wondering if some of these lists would be better using something like
public inbox https://lwn.net/Articles/748184/ like sourceware is using
https://inbox.sourceware.org/. Various announcement lists and things like
scm-commits do not need to have interactive webpages like mailman3
hyperkitty give since they are limited to few people.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
