On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:20 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > >> > >> Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > >> > >> We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare > >> hardware). > >> > >> > >> Some will just not move anytime soon: > >> > > > > Is it possible to look at these as 'why does this need fedmsg?' 'what > > happens if it doesn't have fedmsg', and 'do we need it?' > > > > mailman01 is one where maybe not having it on fedmsg wouldn't be earth > > shattering but it also has the bigger problem of all its libraries being > > FTBFS in Fedora and being retired from there. At which point we go with 'do > > we need to run mailing lists?' > > > > The mailman stack is FTBFS on Fedora right now because of a single > library (python-aiosmtpd) not working properly because of changes in > the SSL module in Python 3.10. The whole stack can branch into RHEL 9 > just fine. >
And apparently that issue was fixed. Branching Mailman in EPEL9 is waiting on people adding infra-sig and epel-packagers-sig to dependencies of the stack. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030061 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
