On 11/2/23 05:32, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > We have (almost) all instances and volumes properly tagged. Now let check > Snapshots. > > OMG - there are A LOT of them. The list has 97k lines! Because of the size I > will not attach it and instead provide link > to download it: https://k00.fr/8p59mvcw > > If you help me to identify something, I can either delete or tag it for you. > > Few things I spotted: > * snapshots of volumes that no longer exists. Can it be deleted? > * lots of snapshots like fedora-coreos-36.20221030.2.3-aarch64 - do we > still need 36 and older?
We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer than we thought it would to get garbage collection implemented. > * Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-20190729.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-standard-0 - is this > snapshots used to generate AMIs for > getfedora.org? Do we still need it? > > If you have snapshots that are important, please check that it have tag > FedoraGroup=* Hmm. Is that required? If so, is it new? When we (Fedora CoreOS Group) create AMIs we don't add tags like this to our AMIs. Dusty _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
