On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:43:55PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý via infrastructure
wrote:
> Dne 01. 10. 24 v 10:15 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > FedoraGroup: qa - PriceSum: $76064
> > Region: us-east-1
> > Service Name: N/A - PriceSum: $76064
> > Volume Type: io1 - Total Size: 6000 GiB - Price: $20250
>
> These are volumes of qa-openqa-worker-{1,2}, qa-openqa-webserver,
> qa-openqa-tmp-server, qa-openqa-tmp-worker.
>
> Do these machines really need io1 volume type? Io1 is about 100x more
> expensive than gp3. And gp3 is sufficient for most workloads.This is part of the 'openqa running in aws' proof of concept... I am not sure, and Adam (cc'ed) is likely very busy with release testing right now. I'd say gp3 might well be fine, but also, if the proof of concept is over and it's just waiting on time to setup/check things, perhaps we should just spin those down for now? Or if there's automated deployment, we could just terminate them for now and re-spin when things are ready to move forward? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
