+1 from me

Michal

On 4/3/25 07:32, Carl George via infrastructure wrote:
The EPEL Steering Committee has realized that the original plan for
EPEL 10 repos will cause some upgrade path problems.  This is
explained in further detail in this issue:

https://pagure.io/epel/issue/324

To address this, we'd like to make some changes to the EPEL 10
portions of the new-updates-sync script and the mirrormanager scanner
repo mappings.  This is set up already in this pull request:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/2557

I feel like these changes are relatively safe for a freeze break and
shouldn't impact Fedora in any way.  In the unlikely event this
doesn't go as planned, we can roll it back by reverting the pull
request.

Can I get some +1's for this plan?


--
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to