On 17/01/2019 07:13, Anil Belur via RT wrote: > On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, [email protected] wrote: >> Adding helpdesk. >> >> I suppose SET_JDK_VERSION should not be an array. >> >> -Lori > > Greetings Lori: > > This approach for passing multiple java-versions (openjdk8 and openjdk11) > seem > to work for the maven-verify jobs but not for the javadocs-verify jobs. This > is because JJB ${job-name} expansion is handling the ${java-version} when the > job name has a variable name included. When the job name does not have the > ${java-version} this is passed as a list to the job. > > I think we may need to make the scripts a little intelligence to handle these > scenarios or simply fix this in the job which requires to be changed in > global-jjb. I've have noted this in Jira and will work on fixing this in > global-jjb to make sure this works properly for other jobs too. > > https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/browse/RELENG-1648
Actually, what is the compelling reason to have a separate javadoc verify job? I mean javadocs are being generated in normal verify jobs, hence it looks to me like duplicate work (given that the javadoc job needs to also generate/compile sources). Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
