Howie,

How do I config it say in memory?


Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:56 PM
To: inFusion Support List
Subject: Re: [iMS] cfx tag very slow


I just ran a test where the cfx tag wrote 1000 emails in just over 10
seconds (using version 1.7).  Here is the code I used:

<cfset x=gettickcount()>
<cfloop from="1" to="1000" index="iddx">
<cfx_imsmail smtpto="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" smtpfrom="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
header_from="test" header_to="test" header_subject="test"
spooldir="e:\deleteme\"
body="this is a test">
</cfloop>
<cfoutput>#evaluate(gettickcount()-x)# ms.</cfoutput>

Did you configure the tag to stay in memory?  Are you writing to a local
drive or another server?

Regards,

Howie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Boyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: [iMS] cfx tag very slow


> All,
>
> We are at our wits end.  We are trying to daily newsletters to 320,000
users
> in a timely fashion.  We use the batchmail.cfm script below to batch the
> mail through the cfx tag 250 emails at a time.  We use cfscheduler to call
> the script every minute.  If the file is not done it assigns various
> statuses until the mail is complete.  Once the status = complete the next
> time the cfm page is called it does this all over again for the next 250
> users(emails).
>
>
> 250 is taking on average of 90 seconds to complete! (Our server is a DELL
> PowerApp120 with dual PIII 866s and 2GB RAM, CF 4.5.1 SP2, iMS POST
> Enterprise 2.0.6 with CFX_IMSMAIL 2.6 (release candidate1) and we were
> running 2.2 as well with no noticeable difference in speed)).
>
> We have tried batching 1000 at a time with an average time of 290 seconds.
> 500 per time at 190 seconds.
>
> We timed the scripts other than cfx and found them to run quite fast.  The
> issue definetly seems to be CFX_IMSMAIL (2.6 as well as 2.2).
>
> Any suggestions?  Any settings to tweak?  Anything?
>
> 12,000 emails per hour is sick on this machine.  We tried just cfmail to
our
> smtp server and in a test environment sent 90,000 emails per hour.  Isn't
> CFX_IMSMAIL supposed to be faster?
>
>
> Matt Boyce
> 101Marketing, Inc.
>
>



========================================================================
     This list server is Powered by iMS
   'The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers'
   --------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
========================================================================



========================================================================
     This list server is Powered by iMS
   'The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers'
   --------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at 
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
========================================================================

Reply via email to