The reason we made the decision we did was beacause there would be additional server 
overhead.  So, it was a matter of

1 - what percentage of our clients would want that functionality?

2 - what is the overhead hit?

3 - are there alternatives?

The answers that we came up with were:

1 - low

2 - relatively low

3 - yes (CFX_ODSMIME)

So, the initial decision was to leave out the functionality but there is always the 
possibility of adding the functionality later
on.  Unfortunately, the feature set for iMS 2.1 is closed and we would need to look 
forward to a subsequent release.  I'm kicking
around the idea here of having a subset of our clients set up in a closed group to 
assist in developing the next new set of features
(this would be a small, devoted group).  For the most part we currently add features 
the we need or that clients as for in email
here or directly to me.  I want to get into a more structured evolvement for the 
product and, I think, this means having a smaller
dedicated group for the next release (this doesn't mean that we would ignore other 
requests for features, just that we would have
better interaction and feedback during the development process).

Regards,

Howie

----- Original Message -----
From: "JustinMacCarthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [iMS] html attachment


> Would there be a lots processing to return a list of the attachments or
> would that be opening a pandoras box?
>
> Justin
>


==^======================================================================
     This list server is Powered by iMS
   "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
   --------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at 
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^======================================================================


Reply via email to