I'm not sure if XP is the successor to 2000 but I didn't think so...
At any rate, if XP supports real system services then iMS should run on it.
Regards,
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Beazley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [iMS] iMS poll
> At 10:55 PM 8/12/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >We're thinking of dropping iMS support for Win95/98/me/xp. Does anyone
> >use iMS on one of those platforms at all? I've only felt
> >that those were platforms for doing demos and nothing more. But now, you
> >can even order laptops with WIN2K preinstalled. And, if
> >someone wanted to demo iMS on one of those platforms we could still make
> >1.5 and 2.0 available for those purposes.
>
> 95/98/ME, no. XP? Isn't the Professional version the successor of Windows
> 2000 Professional?
>
>
> --
> Phillip Beazley
> FutureSights -- Website Hosting, Development & E-commerce
> Visit http://www.futuresights.com/ or call 727-578-9600.
>
==^======================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^======================================================================
