Howie,
What is the best settings for the MX Cache? My current settings are below,
but the server is only averaging about 60 to 100 messages per minute and
this is not acceptable for our purposes. (Our current largest mailing
contains over 400000 subscribers) Also, we currently have Successes turned
on because this is how we track for our publishers, is there some other way
that would be more efficient?
Maximum Threads: 255
Delivery Retry: 30 minutes
MX Cache: 200
MX Timeout: 15 seconds
Minimum BPS: 100 (default)
Allocation Factor: 2 (default)
Thanks for your help.
--
Regards,
Raven R. Cecil
"During war time no remembers peace, and during peace time no remembers
war." - Unknown
"Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties
disappear and obstacles vanish." - John Quincy Adams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
find / -user you -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \;
--
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:58 PM
To: inFusion Support List
Subject: Re: [iMS] Mail Tracking
Basically, the more threads that your server can handle - the better.
Your system should be able to handle 255 with no problem (almost any
system running WINNT Server or WIN2K Server is fine). For a list server
I would use max threads, keep the delivery retry time high (maybe 30
minutes or so), set maximum delivery time to around 24 hrs, and enable
MX caching. I would also not use any real-time delivery notifications
beyond permanent failures (you may want to see temp failures - that's up
to you - but I would definitely not want the notification of swuccessful
deliveries turned on).
Regards,
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: [iMS] Mail Tracking
> Howie,
>
> Should the default installation settings of inFusionMailServer be left
for mass mailings, or is there a better way to optimize? (I gave you my
hardware information in one of the emails below.)
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Raven R. Cecil
>
> "Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which
difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish." - John Quincy Adams
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
>
> "find / -user you -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \;"
> --
>
==^=====================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=====================================================================
==^======================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^======================================================================