OK, I see what's going on now. Previously, I had cfx_imsmail inside a
loop, viz,
<cfloop query="IPList">
<cfx_imsmail smtpto="#email#" header_from
and I recently went to complete tokenization, viz
<cfx_imsmail query="IPList" queryfield="email" header_to="<:smtpto:>"
parsetokens="yes" qtoken_ClassName="ClassName" qtoken_id="id"
qtoken_Contact="Contact"
which explains the difference.
What strategies do folks use to help manage disposition of bounces?
best, paul
At 11:38 PM 2/23/02 -0500, you wrote:
>The way that iMS sends returned mail has not changed from version
>1.0. There is no tokenization - the server simply attaches the
>raw email to the returned email.
>
>Regards,
>
>Howie
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul smith)>
>To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 9:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [iMS] Question About <:foo_bar:> variables
>
>
> > I'm not sure what you are telling me. I'm sure in previous bounces I could
> > look in the attachment to the bounce and see the result of processed
> tokens.
> >
> > If this is expected behavior, it appears to defeat the strategy of
> > including the subscribed address in the body of the message in order to
> > determine which address to unsubscribe.
> >
> > I assume this feature of returning the sent email in an attachment is an
> > attempt to defeat spammers from using bounces to deliver their mail.
> >
> > best, paul
>
>
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^=======================================================
