Howie -- Not to keep beating on a dead horse, but do you have a list of codes that iMS treats as perm vs temp failures? We already know about: 451, 452, 552, 554, but I'm sure there are others.
Thanks again, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:20 AM To: inFusion Support List Subject: Re: [iMS] temp failure question Yes, iMS uses these codes as any other server would. In my experience, there are several mail clients and servers that do strange things with RFC and we do try to accomodate some of these idiosyncracies in iMS but you can't account for them all. And, yes, in this case the remote server is basically telling iMS that there was a permanent delivery failure (IMHO Yahoo email servers are only slightly better than AOL). Regards, Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose Gosende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM Subject: RE: [iMS] temp failure question > Thanks Howie. So, iMS uses these RFC codes to identify a perm/temp failure? > If the receiving mail server doesn't follow RFC, then iMS (rightly so) will > flag the message accordingly (like in this case)? > ==^======================================================= This list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers" -------------------------------------- To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/ Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here: http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/ Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^=======================================================
