Eric MSP Veith escribió:
> The source code needs some cleanup, that's right, and alot of comments, IMHO.
I agree.
> Replacing the .i files with another syntax wouldn't be a good idea in my
> eyes.
Replacing the .i files doesn't mean that they will not be supported
anymore.
> Many people have already customized their init files to match their needs,
> and changing the syntax would put them through a lot of ugly work. The .i
> syntax is nearly perfect IMHO, it needs only some minor cosmetic changes
> (e.g., "script start = { };" is used for services, but "script daemon = { };"
> for daemons).
The syntax should be simplified, I think.
> Let the event-driven init systems develop for awhile, InitNG should first
> finish it's own work so that the "old" system works well. I already made some
> suggestions (e.g., tying service provides together via AND instead of OR, and
> so on). That InitNG made it into Fedora Extras tells me that we're on the
> right way. Sysadmins need a fast, intelligent, easy to manage init system,
> not a new-and-hyped event driven thingy. IMHO.
InitNG internal events will simplify a lot of things, so don't see them
as evil. Evolution is unavoidable.
--
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
