-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I know this might come a little bit late, but I personally always liked the
clean concept of the ifiles. Well, er, honestly, my statement doesn't change
something not should it, since switching the syntax is already decided. ;-)
Perhaps I should stop working on the ifiles documentation then and bginn
writing some stuff for the new syntax?
Eric
On Wednesday 07 March 2007, Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enrico Scholz escribió:
> > Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I'm thinking about moving the current code added by runiscript to a
> >> wrapper script.
> >
> > mmh... good performance was formerly a big advantage of initng. I fear
> > this will be given up when the initscripts are bloaty bash-scripts
> > instead of the small i-files.
>
> I guess there isn't a noticeable performance impact, because the iparser
> plugin has to read and copy the data inside the ifiles, while runiscript
> will not waste time on that...
>
> Anyway, in some future we could replace bash with our own shell, so
> we can provide the ibin commands as builtins.
>
> > The new bash replacement scripts seem to be more complicated and complex
> > than the old i-files.
>
> I think they look similar to sysvinit scripts ;P.
>
> > I guess, new goal is to make initng a SysV clone with some new features
> > like parallel script execution, right?
>
> No, but with this approach we could make a compatibility wrapper that
> let you use old scripts without modifications.
>
> And maybe other weird things... ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF73M/MpEdE19y46cRAmrwAKCnfL62F/zWBqSLPKo404Xs/85zugCePwwS
0tvXMf+x0iYRd7lSJ8AbS2g=
=2uyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
