El martes, 26 de junio de 2007 13:17 +0200, dragoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > http://www.initng.org/changeset/5213/initng moves the runlevel files > out of runlevel/ but genrunlevel still uses this dir. > The question is if we want to get rid of the runlevel dir or if we > want it and revert that change. > any comments?
The initng-scripts genrunlevel doesn't uses runlevel/, and trunk has no support for ifiles. Well, now that service_file and the scripts format should not have any changes that affect the usage, we have two options: 1. Continue to use wrappers for runlevel/services. Then we shouldn't use runlevel/, because now it's implicit in the name what kind of service it is. 2. Put a script called "any" in runlevel/, and make it parse the runlevel files. This is obviously more compatible, so i think it's the best option. The only reason I implemented this stuff the other way, was because the old implementation of service_file search routine wasn't able do deal with this in a sane way.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
